Best Movie Franchise

IMDB poses the question: Best movie that sparked a successful franchise of at least four installments? The candidates:

Jaws
Alien
Rocky
Dr. No
Batman
Predator
Die Hard
The Omen
Superman
Manhunter
Star Wars
Halloween
Dirty Harry
Scary Movie
The Karate Kid
Friday the 13th
Lethal Weapon
Police Academy
Planet of the Apes
A Nightmare on Elm Street
The Hunt for Red October
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone

Among the candidates on offer, Alien, Jaws, and Star Wars all go to the top of my list. I ended up voting for the last, but it was close. BTW, Highlander—high on my pwersonal list of guilty pleasures—is conspicuous by its absence.

A more interesting question, however, would be: What’s the best successful franchise of at least four installments? In other words, look at the quality of all movies in this series rather than just the original flick. Jaws and Star Wars would plummet. Ditto Highlander (II and The Source have to be among the worst movies of all time). Alien would stay near or at the top. James Bond surges. Ditto Harry Potter.

Speaking of guilty pleasures, check out this post by Henry on the incredibly lame answers given by a bunch of academics. I’ll probably blog on it over at the BA Blog.

Posted on Wednesday, September 26 2007 | Permalink

I beg to differ on whether Alien would stay near the top if one considers the subsequent films.  While Aliens was good and Alien III passable, Alien IV and AvP sucked—and that’s being generous.

Similarly for Bond.  For every good Bond movie, there’s a turkey.

I would actually go with Die Hard as the best.  Die Hard III was a fun action movie, and Die Hard II wasn’t too bad.  I admit to skipping IV, but that would have to be bad on a Highlander: the Source level to knock down the first three movies.

Posted by Snarky Associate  on  09/26  at  08:37 PM

What, no “Star Trek?”

Posted by  on  09/27  at  02:08 PM

I’d put Dirty Harry up there with Die Hard, in terms of quality.  And frankly, the first Star Trek movie was mediocre—below the average for the original tv series.  On th eIMDB question, though, I’d have to go with Star Wars.

Posted by  on  09/27  at  03:02 PM

Raiders of the Lost Ark should be on that list come next May.

Posted by  on  09/27  at  03:26 PM

I probably reviewed about half of the films on this list in my movie reviewer days (i.e., college, grad school), and Star Wars was on my All-Time Top Ten list.  The only other movies that I would have considered giving four stars would be Alien and Dirty Harry.  Maybe.

Star Wars was the only film that had it all in terms of the quality of the script, acting, cinematography/special effects, score, and everything else that contributed to making it a transporting and fun experience.  BTW - my glowing review of the film at the time got a lot of heat from the artsy side of the school.  They ridiculed it as something that only an aerospace engineering major could love (referring to my major).  Back then, any movie with obvious appeal to a wide audience was suspect in the eyes of the campus humanities types.

Posted by M. Hodak  on  09/27  at  04:30 PM

How positively weird. The oldest movie is, what Dr. No from the 60’s? There were seriously no movie franchises before that? Or were they all so bad they don’t count? Tarzan, Flash Gordon, Blondie, Abbott and Costello, The Bowery Boys, Laurel and Hardy, Charly Chaplin, Charlie Chan and the like may win the modern standards of great, but they still deserve to be on the list.

Would you count High Plains Drifter and or Pale Rider as the continued adventures of the Man With No Name? If so, my vote is for FFoD.

Posted by Kristian  on  09/27  at  05:53 PM

Introduction


Recent Punditry Entries


Hot Topics on Food & Wine

Hot Topics on Law & Business


Punditry RSS Feed

Flickr

Archives

My Books



Blogroll