Dating Dealbreakers

Althouse:

Right Wing News interviews conservative female bloggers about dating.

    I tend not to date liberals, for a reason. Politics is so important to what I do and I follow it so much. I can’t respect a guy who’s liberal all that much because it makes me question his intelligence. So, that’s a big minus because I’m thinking how smart can this guy be if he thinks John Kerry is a great politician? (Laughs) If he thinks Barack Obama would be a great President, I think, gee, how bright could this guy be?

Ugh. This is almost as annoying as this essay the other day in the NYT — it’s now #1 on their most-emailed list — about these literary types who abhor love from people who don’t know all the authors or don’t like the right books:

...

    [S]ometimes, it’s the Howard Roark problem… “I did have to break up with one guy because he was very keen on Ayn Rand,” said Laura Miller, a book critic for Salon. “He was sweet and incredibly decent despite all the grandiosely heartless ‘philosophy’ he espoused, but it wasn’t even the ideology that did it. I just thought Rand was a hilariously bad writer, and past a certain point I couldn’t hide my amusement.”...

I don’t know. I’ve been happily married for 21+ years and hopefully will never be back out on the dating market, but if I were I’m pretty sure Ayn Rand would be a dealbreaker for me. Although, I do know a bunch of Objectivist pickup lines:

  • “Did you know that nakedness is the highest form of psychological visibility?”
  • “Let me show you what sex qua sex can be.”
  • “Yeah baby. It is made of Rearden Metal.”
  • “You’re certainly practicing the Virtue Of Sexiness tonight.”
  • Posted on Monday, March 31 2008 | Permalink

"Be my tool tonight; if you are satisfied it will not be because I have any obligation to do so—know instead that it served me to pleasure you.”

On the Right Wing Date:

Every time I read these sorts of things I howl thinking back on all that tiresome eye-rolling sanctimony about “elitism” and “snobbery” that the right often toss at the left.

Posted by  on  03/31  at  06:01 PM

I remember talking with an attractive woman at a cocktail party years ago (well before I met my wonderful wife) and things were going well till I mentioned I liked Ayn Rand.  She was shocked and said something like “I thought you were smart.”

I took it in good humor (and while I did not back down) and did not get confrontational about it.  Unfortunately, I also did not close the deal (let alone get her phone number). 

If she had actually read Ayn Rand and the Fountainhead, she might have gotten to the part where Dominique Francon imagines her body as the city, with Howard Rourke the architect...doing wonderful things to her.  Her loss.

Posted by  on  04/01  at  10:38 AM

Joe,

Perhaps she had started to read the Fountainhead and was troubled by Roarke’s raping Dominique Francon the first time they have sex. One of those weird little things that sometimes bothers women when idealized.

And I say this as someone who read all of Rand’s fiction output and about half her published nonfiction—when I was 15. It’s very nice when one is a socially inept teenager to believe that one is part of this elite that Rand describes, who do not do things to follow the crowd and never pretend or exaggerate anything. But most people eventually realize that it often helps in a job interview, or in other encounters with strangers, to bump up one’s actual level of enthusiasm.

Posted by PG  on  04/01  at  12:09 PM

Hah!

Posted by  on  04/01  at  04:32 PM

Rand’s writing is one of those things that, like Def Leppard (if you grew up in the 1980’s) you’d now be embarrassed to admit that as a teenager you thought it was cool.

Posted by  on  04/01  at  09:19 PM

Wouldn’t a Randian pickup line be, like, three hours long?

Posted by Ken  on  04/02  at  08:10 PM
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Introduction


Recent Punditry Entries


Hot Topics on Food & Wine

Hot Topics on Law & Business


Punditry RSS Feed

Flickr

Archives

My Books



Blogroll