Vladimir Nabokov’s last, unpublished novel is written on index cards that are in the hands of his son, Dmitri. However, Vladimir’s dying request was not that the novel be published, but rather that it be destroyed.
This presents Dmitri with a bit of a dilemma: honoring his father’s request may mean destroying a novel that the world might love to read. Does he have any obligation not to destroy the novel? If not, then the decision should be an easy one. Presumably he has some sort of obligation to abide by his father’s wishes. If there’s no countervailing duty, then his decision is clear.
I don’t see the problem. Honor your father and mother. Respect the last wish of a dying man. Respect the wishes of the author. Three simple rules. Three strikes against publication.
Kafka made much the same request; thank God (or Brod, if you’d rather) his friend did not comply. Has Dmitri ever said why his father made the request? Or how long before his death the novel was written? Not that it matters, just curious—VN was such a methodical worker, it’s hard to imagine he spent all that time on something that was garbage.
Next entry: More on why Bill Gates Hates Capitalism
Previous entry: Roommate Wars
Ah, but was he of sound mind when he requested the novel be destroyed?