David Greenberg of Slate on ”Why Biden’s plagiarism shouldn’t be forgotten”
Teachers and scholars consider the unattributed use of someone else’s words and ideas to be a very serious offense, but the public doesn’t seem to mind much, at least when it comes to politics. The incidents of plagiarism and fabrication that forced Joe Biden to quit the 1988 presidential race have drawn little comment since his selection as Barack Obama’s vice presidential running mate—just as revelations of plagiarism by Stephen Ambrose and Doris Kearns Goodwin scarcely hurt their book sales. In 1987, before Biden quit the race, he called the incidents “a tempest in a teapot.” Although most reporters disagreed then, at least enough to pursue the story, they seem now—perhaps jaded by two decades of scandal-mongering—to have come around to Biden’s view.
But Biden’s exit from the 1988 race is worth recalling in detail, because his transgressions far exceeded Obama’s own relatively innocent lifting of rhetorical set pieces from his friend Deval Patrick, which occasioned a brief flap last February. Biden’s misdeeds encompassed numerous self-aggrandizing thefts, misstatements, and exaggerations that seemed to point to a serious character defect.
The article reviews the “number and extent of Biden’s fibs, distortions, and plagiarisms.”
The college plagerism was bad but relatively remote in time. I would not attack a guy forever over that--its not like he drove off a bridge while drunk and got some young female staffer drowned (and because of family connections avoided all criminal liability). As for the speech plagerism, it was sloppy but again it was a speech and that is not the context where you have to footnote or cite everything you say.
But Obama has other problems.
Plugs Biden and Michele Obama can’t fill those annoying holes in Barack’s resume and past associations.
But hey Barack was just a kid when Bill Ayers did what he did. Look at this: http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/bill-ayers-stepping-on-us-flag-in-2001.html
Why in 2001, Barack Obama was only...uh...40 or 41.
”...drawn little comment since his selection as Barack Obama’s vice presidential running mate”
This has been endlessly commented on for over 20-years; most recently during Biden’s aborted run for the nomination earlier this year. Really, can much more be said about it?
He has a 36-year record in the Senate and this the issue that is the most important to focus on relative to his fitness to serve? Is this the standard for which we will judge all candidates?
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/08/figures-michelle-obama-quotes-lines.html
I do not believe Michele was sending coded messages to the leftists last night, but if she did lift a quote from Saul Alinsky, is that plagerism? What exactly did Plugs Biden whisper in her ear the other day?
I think the last completely original political speech was by Lincoln at Gettysburg.
Yawn.
If I remember correctly, DKG was accused of plagiarism in the book that had 900 or so footnotes, which told me she didn’t intend to copy.
We probably have something better to talk about, say the economy in the crapper or the troops in Iraq.
Joe--you’re so witty; I’m sure your hero McComb-Over is LHAO.
Next entry: Red State Update on Biden
Previous entry: Joe Biden and the Gospel of Life
The accusation seems very weak to me. He did the disclosure The article says: “At first Biden would credit Kinnock when he quoted him. But at some point he failed to offer the attribution.”
We also know that most of the candidates, presidents and so on have their speechwriters, which will be considered also a serious offense if done by teachers, students or scholars, that their work is attributed to a ghostwriter.
I never was a fan of having the requirement of students write a paper - not for the purpose of pass or failing a class.