Professor Bainbridge...on law, politics, religion, culture & food

And of course here is Mitt Romney mentioning Ronald Reagan, but just not in the same sort of context as last night: 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/01/mccain_a_tale_of_two_mitts_web.html

Washington’s problem isn’t a lack of data, or a failure to calibrate the incentives as in the business world. Congress and the multiple layers of government respond exactly as you’d expect given the incentives for self-preservation and turf protection that always exist in political institutions. The only way to overcome them is with leadership on behalf of good ideas backed by public support. The fact that someone as bright as Mr. Romney doesn’t recognize this Beltway reality risks a Presidency that would get rolled quicker than you can say Jimmy Carter.

All the more so because we haven’t been able to discern from his campaign, or his record in Massachusetts, what his core political principles are. Mr. Romney spent his life as a moderate Republican, and he governed the Bay State that way after his election in 2002. While running this year, however, he has reinvented himself as a conservative from radio talk show-casting, especially on immigration.

The problem is not that Mr. Romney is willing to reconsider his former thinking. Nor is it so much that his apparent convictions always seem in sync with the audience to which he is speaking at the moment. (Think $20 billion in corporate welfare for Michigan auto makers.) Plenty of politicians attune their positions to new constituencies. The larger danger is that Mr. Romney’s conversions are not motivated by expediency or mere pandering but may represent his real governing philosophy.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120182471883733637.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

Hugh Hewitt at the Movies:

Mitt Romney getting Santorum’s endorsement today is like Jack Nickelson getting kissed by the strange woman in the hotel room in The Shining.