Spitzer = Nixon?

Here at PB.com, we have been ignoring our old bête noire Eliot Spitzer. Once he moved up from NY AG to Governor, he could no longer do quite so much damage to the US economy, so he passed off our radar screen. If the people of New York were dumb enough to entrust themselves to Spitzer, that was their problem.

Well, he's back. From the Law Blog:

Many on Wall Street must be reveling in the irony. It appears New York Gov Eliot Spitzer, who became famous for his no-holds-barred prosecution of alleged corporate misdeeds, is enmeshed in a mess of his own.

According to a report released yesterday, the governor’s aides used the state police to gather information about Spitzer’s chief political rival, Joseph Bruno, New York’s state senate majority leader.

My gosh. If Spitzer were a Republican, people would be making comparisons to Nixon and calling for impeachment. (Actually, Spitzer reminds me a lot of Nixon, but that's a story for another day.) To be sure, at the moment, Spitzer's aides are taking the fall. But as the W$J points out:

At a minimum, however, it seems implausible that Mr. Dopp, the Governor's close adviser and communications director, would undertake a campaign to destroy the leader of the political opposition without his boss's tacit support. Mr. Spitzer's role needs to be more fully investigated and aired, and, who knows, maybe even reporters other than those at the New York Post will follow the story.

Speaking of the Post, here's some of their reporting:

The scathing, 53-page report detailed a months-long scheme in which Dopp, Howard, and Felton - at times with the partial knowledge of Spitzer chief of staff Richard Baum - used the State Police to gather and create misleading and inaccurate records on Bruno's use of state aircraft to travel from Albany to Manhattan in hopes of showing he was using the flights strictly for political purposes, a possibly illegal action. ...

The report confirmed a week's worth of investigative stories in The Post beginning July 5 that found aides to Spitzer, including Dopp, used the State Police as, in effect, a spy agency as part of a broad conspiracy aimed at destroying Bruno.

Nixonian really is the word that comes to mind. The Post opines:

The governor - preposterously, given his personality - suggested the plot was all news to him.  ... Back when he was the scourge of Wall Street, would Spitzer for one minute have accepted such a defense - that he didn't know about a major political scheme carried out by his own top aides? One that included, to a degree, Chief of Staff Richard Baum?

Whether Spitzer knew about it or not, of course, the plot was clearly - indisputably - an abuse of power. (And conducted, it needs to be noted, in a clownishly inept manner.) ...

Certainly a plot like this is in sync with Spitzer's record - in his eight years as attorney general, and carrying over into his first half-year as governor. His nasty, hardball bullying - calling Bruno a "senile piece of s---" or telling state Sen. William Larkin he'll "cut [his] head off" - is of a piece with the plot against the majority leader.

Meanwhile, the always clueless NY Times is still blithely quoting Spitzer chief of staff Richard Baum - who had "partial knowledge" of the scheme to use police to "destroy" a political enemy of Spitzer:

“It’s who he is, and part of what’s great about him as a person and as governor,” Mr. Baum said.

In fairness, that quote's a little bit out of context. But still, it says something about the Times' biases.

Update: Slate calls me a "longtime Spitzer antagonist." Guilty as charged. See, e.g.,  Spitzer v. Grasso and Spitzer Goes over the Line. Also http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2003/09/can_you_be_a_co.html. And that's just a small sample.

Posted on Tuesday, July 24 2007 | Permalink

Excellent news!
I hope they hang high this power-mad, ego-maniacal, fraud.

Posted by verc  on  07/25  at  06:15 AM

Gov. Spitzer is essentially a thug wearing an expensive suit.  He rode his “style” all the way to Albany (thanks in large part to his party affiliation and a press-hound tenacity that nearly puts Chuck Schumer to shame) and now seems to think that he can continue to behave badly in a job in which he doesn’t enjoy the ability to indict a ham sandwich.

Even though I suspect that Mr. Bruno’s skirts aren’t entirely clean in this matter, Spitzer is clearly playing in a tougher league than he has before.  Furthermore, there’s another thug sitting in his former chair (i.e., Mr. Cuomo) who is probably relishing the ability to make Spitzer’s life miserable without having to actually indict any of his democratic buds.

On the whole a sordid situation for the voters and taxpayers of the Empire State.

Posted by Slope Oaks  on  07/25  at  08:31 AM

Slope Oaks brings up a point that I had forgotten, Anrew Cuomo. Cuomo was shafted, really shafted, by the Dems and the Attorney Gerneral spot is a consolation prize. He certainly has no reason to cover for the Democratic Party in the state.

That said, the lt. governor is a nobody, and I fear that the loss of a strong governor would be the loss of the third leg of a tripod. Little gets done now, but with Bruno and Silver alone making the decisions nothing will get done.

On the third hand, perhaps that is a feature, not a bug.

Posted by Chuck Simmins  on  07/25  at  04:58 PM

I am intrigued by how often these stories mention the Attorney General’s report, while playing down or even not mentioning that said Attorney General is the notably ambitious Andrew Cuomo, or that both Spitzer and Cuomo are Democrats. I’m not sure exactly how playing down the connection would fit or refute the standard theories of media bias.

This is one of those scandals which, since it has never happened before, people are uncertain how scandalous it is, or even whether it is, or ought to be, illegal. Naturally, partisanship and personal advantage will color reactions. And in this case, we just don’t know all the details; nor will we ever, except possibly if there’s a formal investigation with testimony under oath. Of course, whether we should start such an investigation is also a polarizing question, and inevitably carries a sense of prejudgment about how serious the affair is.

Posted by DWPittelli  on  07/25  at  06:51 PM

Hey Bainbridge, you think you’re safe on the other coast?  I’m a fucking steamroller, and I’ll roll over you, too.

Posted by E. Spitzer  on  07/25  at  10:21 PM

I am very thankful not to be living in the Dumpire State . New York voters exhibit such masochism :
three terms for Andrew Cuomo ‘ s Daddy MARIO as
Governor , the election of Mrs . CLINTON ( the “ New
Yorker “ carpetbagger from ARKANSAS ) , oppressively
high taxes that abuse the Middle Class - - and now , the elevation of a menacing public nusiance the likes of Eliot Spitzer to serve as the Chief Exec . for at least one term , with the NEW YORK TIMES ‘ s blessing . Abysmal ! I am inclined to think the citizens of New York deserve better , until I recollect that they , as voters , are complicit .

The ham - handed tactics of Attorney General Spitzer
were bound to continue in some lame fashion during his Governorship . Who knew he and his toadies would get caught so soon ? I just hope the Democratic Party shan ‘ t be touting Governor Spitzer as the ‘ next Roosevelt ‘ in 2 0 1 2 or 2 0 1 6 . I wonder how DailyKOS , et . al . , rationalize the ‘ dirty tricks ‘ of the Democrats ‘ most Nixonian pol .

Eliot Spitzer , Russell Feingold ; what kind of indoctrination do these crypto - fascists receive at Harvard Law School ? What ‘ progressive ‘ foolishness moves ‘ Blue ‘ State voters to support them ?

Posted by T A M N Y , T . D .  on  07/26  at  02:48 AM

TAMNYTD,

Hey, I’ve got two degrees from Harvard (not law) and I live in Massachusetts just 10 miles from the New York (and Vermont!) border. It doesn’t necessarily turn you into a pinko. (Some have even gone to the other extreme, with, for example, the John Birch Society having been founded in Mass.)

It’s sad to think of the decline of the Empire State, and of course not a coincidence that New York has, at least since the Depression, had unusually high state (and federal) spending on the welfare state and other things, a large state payroll, and very high taxes. Damaging as these things have been for New York City, the decline of numerous small industrial towns has been worse, as the shrinking presence of IBM, Xerox and Kodak has not been replaced with much entrepreneurial activity

Posted by DWPittelli  on  07/26  at  04:33 AM

Hodak Value...kudos.
Your comment elicited a big belly laugh. grin

I’m sure Spitzer does have the Prof. on his enemies list.

Posted by verc  on  07/26  at  05:55 AM
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Introduction


Recent Punditry Entries


Hot Topics on Food & Wine

Hot Topics on Law & Business


Punditry RSS Feed

Flickr

Archives

My Books



Blogroll