Ted Frank updates his analyses of Obama’s tax plans. Money quote:
My colleagues Alex Brill and Alan Viard have calculated the marginal tax rates under Obama’s various promises of phased-out credits, and find that he will raise effective marginal federal income tax rates to as high as 45%—which is well over 60% for people living in high-tax states like New York or California or the District of Columbia. (Even people making $45,000 will face a marginal income tax rate of 39%, which is 51.4% including social security taxes.)
Sixty percent!?!
"people living in high-tax states like New York or California”
Isn’t that a problem to address at the state level?
Out of the millions of tax payers the two or three that could really be impacted in this manner are really representative.
Did Brill and/or Viard work for the Bush administration and use the same type of “representative” examples to demonstrate how the Bush tax cut benefited the poor. I know the Bush people did it, the question is were these two part of the Bush team that developed this phony analysis.
Next entry: Trouble for Obama's Pro-Life Supporters
Previous entry: Cool Maps
That is even worse than what my wife spends!